→ Home

IFRS 15 Over-Time vs Point-in-Time Revenue: Decision Framework

By Usman Qureshi · July 2026 · 8 min read
In this guide

The timing of revenue recognition— over-time vs point-in-time— determines your annual revenue pattern. This guide explains the control transfer tests and how to choose the right method.

Point-in-Time Revenue (Single Moment)

Revenue recognized at one moment when control of goods/services transfers. Common in retail, e-commerce, manufacturing.

Over-Time Revenue (Gradual)

Revenue recognized throughout the performance period. Common in SaaS, construction, professional services.

Control Transfer Indicators

Over-time recognition is appropriate if:

Point-in-time recognition is typical if:

Over-Time Methods

Method When Example
Output Measure actual goods/services delivered Consulting: £X per day = revenue per day worked
Input Measure resources used (costs incurred) Construction: 30% of costs spent = 30% revenue

Worked Example: Construction Contract

Scenario: £5,000,000 building contract. Estimated total costs £4,000,000 over 24 months.

Audit Challenge: Justifying Over-Time

Common auditor pushback: "You've recognized revenue over-time on this software project, but your contract is a fixed-price lump-sum delivery. When does control transfer? Justify over-time."

Requires documented evidence that customer benefits throughout the process, not just at delivery.

Red flag: Company recognizes revenue over-time without clear documentation of when/how control transfers. Auditors often challenge and require point-in-time recognition until control transfer is proven.

Real-Life Case Study: Deciding When Control Transfers

Scenario. A manufacturer builds custom machinery for £2m. Does it recognise revenue over the 10-month build, or only on delivery?

Analysis. Over-time recognition applies if any one of three criteria is met. Here the machine is highly customised (no alternative use to the manufacturer) and the contract gives an enforceable right to payment for work done to date, including margin. Both point to over time, recognised by cost-to-cost input method: at £1.2m cost of an expected £1.5m, 80% complete, so £1.6m revenue.

Takeaway. "No alternative use" alone is not enough, it must be paired with an enforceable right to payment. Miss that link and you can wrongly defer revenue to delivery, understating profit for most of the build.

Illustrative composite scenario for educational purposes. Figures are indicative and do not represent any specific company.

Related Articles in This Cluster

→ IFRS 15 Revenue Hub

• IFRS 15 Performance Obligations: Identifying Distinct Goods & Services

• IFRS 15 Variable Consideration: Discounts, Bonuses & Constraint Application

• IFRS 15 Contract Assets & Liabilities: Timing Differences & Disclosure

Educational content. Revenue timing decisions are subject to auditor challenge. Consult a qualified accountant.