← Usman Qureshi — Free AI Tools for Audit & CFO Advisory

Accounting Interview: Technical & Behavioral Questions

By Usman Qureshi (ACCA, ACA) · Published July 2026 · Last reviewed July 2026 · 12 min read

Preparing for an accounting job interview? Most candidates prepare for technical questions (goodwill impairment, lease accounting) but neglect behavioral questions. This guide covers both: technical accounting scenarios (the harder part) AND behavioral questions (the differentiator). Learn how to use the STAR method to turn your work experience into compelling stories. Real questions from Big 4 audit, corporate finance, and FP&A interviews — with model answers that show how to communicate technical depth AND soft skills (teamwork, problem-solving, integrity).

In this guide

Interview Format: What to Expect

Typical accounting interview (60 minutes):

Interview style: Conversational, not quiz show. Interviewers want to hear your thinking. Say "I'm not sure, but I'd approach it this way..." rather than staying silent.

Technical Accounting Questions

Q: What is a finance lease under IFRS 16? How do you measure it?
Model Answer:
A finance lease (now just called a "lease" under IFRS 16) is a lease where substantially all risks and rewards of ownership transfer to the lessee. Measurement: ROU asset = PV of lease payments + initial direct costs + estimated restoration costs (discounted at the lease's implicit rate or lessee's incremental borrowing rate). Lease liability = PV of lease payments. Each year, accrue interest on the liability and depreciate the ROU asset.

Why this matters: Most leases now appear on the balance sheet, increasing reported assets and liabilities. This affects debt-to-equity ratios and ROA.
Q: A company acquires a target with significant intangible assets. How do you treat goodwill vs identified intangibles?
Model Answer:
Identifiable intangibles: Assets with finite lives (brand names, customer relationships, non-compete agreements). Measured at fair value. Amortised over useful life. Examples: customer list (15 years), brand name (10 years).

Goodwill: The residual (purchase price − fair value of all identified net assets, including identifiable intangibles). Goodwill is NOT amortised; instead, tested annually for impairment. Goodwill reflects the "going concern premium" and expected synergies.

Why this matters: Misclassifying a finite-life intangible as goodwill overstates goodwill risk. Auditors must challenge the separation.
Q: A customer returns goods after the reporting period. When do you reverse the revenue?
Model Answer:
Under IFRS 15, if a customer has a contractual right of return, you estimate the likelihood and amount of returns. Revenue is recognised net of expected returns.

Scenario: goods shipped Dec 31, customer return arrives Jan 10. If the return is within the company's standard 30-day return window (and the customer is exercising that right), the return was probable at year-end. You should have recognised revenue net of the estimated return at Dec 31. Now, reverse the revenue in Jan when the return is confirmed.

Why this matters: Timing of return recognition affects December revenue and January refund recognition. Audit carefully for post-year-end returns.

Behavioral Questions & STAR Method

STAR = Situation, Task, Action, Result. Structure your answer this way.

Q: Tell me about a time you discovered an error in your work or a colleague's work. How did you handle it?
STAR Answer:
Situation: During a year-end audit of a £50M manufacturing client, I was testing inventory provisions. My colleague had prepared a reserve for obsolete stock based on last quarter's data.

Task: I needed to complete the testing and validate the provision amount.

Action: I recalculated the provision using current-month scrap reports (latest data, not Q3 data). I found the provision was £200k understated. Instead of just flagging it to my manager, I walked through my calculation with my colleague first, showed them the newer data, and asked if they'd missed the latest reports. They hadn't realised the scrap reports had been updated.

Result: We corrected the provision to £800k. My colleague appreciated the collaborative approach (not a gotcha moment). The client accepted the adjustment. We also discussed how to avoid missing updated data in future audits.

Why this works: Shows integrity (catching the error), judgment (approaching it constructively, not punitively), and teamwork.

Conflict & Judgment Scenarios

Q: Your manager asks you to sign off on an audit procedure you didn't perform. What do you do?
Model Answer:
I would not sign off. As an accountant, I have a professional responsibility to ensure work I attest to is actually completed. If I sign off falsely, I'm putting my professional reputation and the firm's reputation at risk.

My approach:
1. Ask my manager why: "Is the procedure not needed, or do you want me to complete it?"
2. If time pressure is the issue: "I can complete this by [tomorrow morning] to meet the deadline."
3. If my manager insists I sign without performing: I would escalate to the audit partner. This is a serious professional breach.

Why this matters: Auditors are trusted by the public. Falsifying work papers is fraud. Interviewers want to see you have values and won't compromise them under pressure.

Teamwork & Leadership Questions

Q: Describe a time you had to work with someone you didn't see eye-to-eye with. How did you manage it?
STAR Answer:
Situation: I was working on a consolidation project with a colleague from the subsidiary who had a different approach to intercompany eliminations. They wanted to record detailed sub-ledgers; I favored a summary approach for speed.

Task: We had 3 days to complete consolidation before the group close deadline.

Action: Instead of debating approaches, I said, "Let's both show the benefits of each method and see which fits our timeline and the CFO's preference." We sketched both, timed them, and found a hybrid (detailed in the first pass, then summarised for reporting). Then I asked what was driving their preference for detail—turned out they were concerned about audit trail. I understood that and we solved for it differently.

Result: We delivered consolidation on time. My colleague felt heard and respected. They later told me they appreciated that I didn't dismiss their approach, just problem-solved together. We've worked together on 3 projects since.

Why this works: Shows emotional intelligence, collaborative problem-solving, and respect for others.

Pre-Interview Preparation

Interview Tips & Dos/Don'ts

DOs:

DON'Ts:

Want to practice more scenarios?

Use our Knowledge Test tool to drill interview-style technical questions and get feedback.

Practice With Knowledge Test →

FAQs

Should I tell them I'm nervous?

No. A light "I'm a bit nervous, but excited to be here" at the start is fine. But don't dwell on it. Just be professional and answer their questions.

What if I don't know the answer?

Say: "That's a good question. I haven't worked directly with [topic], but I'd approach it by... [show your thinking]." Honesty + problem-solving beats silence.

How much should I talk?

Aim for 40% you talking, 60% them talking (over the interview). For each question, speak for 2— minutes, then pause and let them follow up or move to the next question.

UQ

About the author — Usman Qureshi (ACCA, ACA)

Usman has conducted 100+ accounting job interviews for Big 4 and mid-tier firms. He also coaches candidates on interview technique and technical content.

This guide is based on real interview experiences and best practices. Interview formats vary by company and role. Always research the specific interviewer/firm and tailor your answers to their focus areas.

Real-Life Case Study: Answering a Technical Question Under Pressure

Scenario. In a final-round interview, "Priya" is asked to explain, on a whiteboard, how a £1m machine bought on 1 January (useful life 5 years, no residual value) flows through the financial statements in year one.

Her answer. She worked it methodically: capitalise £1m to PPE; depreciate £200k straight-line to the income statement; carrying amount £800k at year end; the £1m cash outflow sits in investing activities, while the £200k depreciation is a non-cash add-back in operating cash flow. She then flagged that if the asset were impaired, IAS 36 would require a recoverable-amount test.

Takeaway. Technical interviews reward a structured walk across all three statements plus one "what could go wrong" observation. Narrate your logic aloud so the interviewer can follow your reasoning even if you slip on a number.

Illustrative composite scenario for educational purposes. Figures are indicative and do not represent any specific company.